ExcitingAds! Search

Directory A-B C-E F-H I-K L-N O-Q R-T U-W X-Z

ExcitingAds! HowStuffWorks.com: Civil War - RSS

↑ Grab this Headline Animator



Site Map


Knife Set - Abraham Lincoln
This handsome folding pocket knife features a 3 inch stainless steel blade an eagle embossed on the handle with a picture of our 16th President. The knife is custom mounted in a deluxe book style box with the presidential seal on the front. Overall Length: 7 inches.
Price: 19.99

Gettysburg Knife Set
This handsome boxed set features a Collector Series pocket knife with a 3 inch stainless steel lock-back blade. A color picture of the battle of Gettysburg is engraved in the handle and printed on the wood box. Overall Length: 7 inches.
Price: 8.99

Knife Set - George Washington
This handsome folding pocket knife features a 3 inch stainless steel blade an eagle embossed on the handle with a picture of our 1st President. The knife is custom mounted in a deluxe book style box with the presidential seal on the front. Overall Length: 7 inches.
Price: 19.99

Knife Set - Robert E Lee Tin Box
This handsome set features a 3.25 inch stainless steel polished blade lock back knife. The handle is heavily embossed on both sides with Confederate Flags in color and the likeness of General Lee. Included is a brass Civil War cavalry insignia and a tin box with foam insert
Price: 19.99

Knife Set - Folding Boxed Robert E Lee
This Limited Edition, Numbered set includes an old style folding pocket knife that has as two engraved 4 inch stainless steel blades, Lee's signature on the handle, and a wood box depicting his portrait and a mini biography 1807-1870.
Price: 35.99

WWI German SA Dagger Replica
This German Leader Dagger has a black metal scabbard black plastic handle with gold tone metal fittings and an 8.5 inch stainless steel blade. Length: 15 inches Weight: 1.1 Lbs
Price: 19.99

Lufwaffe - WWII Dagger Replica
This classic German Luftwaffe B25 dagger features a 10 inch stainless steel blade, Luftwaffe insignia handguard, plastic grips and metal pommel and scabbard. Length: 16.5 inches Weight: 1.2 lbs.
Price: 19.99

Knives- Lockback Lee Traveler Tin Box Set
LIMITED SUPPLY! This boxes set includes a 7 inch lock blade stainless steel knife tucked into a tin box with a likeness of General Lee sitting on Traveler on the front and on the knife handle. Knife Blade: 3 inches Overall Length: 7 inches
Price: 8.99

Knives - Lockback Lee Troops Tin Box Set
LIMITED SUPPLY! This boxes set includes a 7 inch lock blade stainless steel knife tucked into a tin box with a likeness of General Lee leading troops on the front and on the knife handle. Knife Blade: 3 inches Overall Length: 7 inches
Price: 8.99

Knives - Confederate CSA Infantry Tin Box Set
LIMITED SUPPLY! This boxes set includes a 7 inch lock blade stainless steel knife tucked into a tin box with a Civil War Battle scene on the front and on the knife handle. Knife Blade: 3 inches Overall Length: 7 inches
Price: 8.99

Knives - Lockback CSA Cavalry Tin Box Set
LIMITED SUPPLY! This boxes set includes a 7 inch lock blade stainless steel knife tucked into a tin box with a Civil War Battle scene on the front and on the knife handle. Knife Blade: 3 inches Overall Length: 7 inches
Price: 8.99

Bowie Knife - D-guard w Sheath
This Civil War D-GUARD Bowie Knife features a 10.25 inch carbon steel blade solid brass D hand guard and wood handle. Length: 15.5 inches Weight: 1.2 lbs.
Price: 41.99

Replica Ames Rifleman Knife
This Civil War fighting knife features a 12" carbon steel blade, wood handle with brass cross guard and leather scabbard with brass fittings. Overall length: 19", Weight: 2.7 lbs
Price: 39.99

Civil War Dagger Replica - CSA D-guard
This style knife was originally made famous by Jim Bowie though a similar design was used by many early explorers of the West. Its features include a 10.25 inch carbon steel blade solid brass D hand guard and wooden handle. This knife comes with a leather scabbard. Overall length: 15.5 inches Weight: 1.2 lbs
Price: 36.99

Medieval Dagger Replica w Horn Handle
This is a sleek and classic 15th Century design. This dagger features an 8 inch stainless steel blade horn grip and solid brass hand guard and pommel and leather scabbard. Blade: 8 inches stainless steel.
Price: 31.99

Medieval Dagger Replica - Cross Pommel
The design of this dagger is classic for its era and displays the Cross of Christendom on the handle identifying it as an instrument of the Crusade. This dagger s features also include a 12.5 inch carbon steel blade brass handguard and pommel. The scabbard is black leather with brass furniture. Blades are not full battle worthy and cannot be sharpened. Length: 20.5 inches Weight: 2.2 lbs.
Price: 54.99

Roman Pugio Dagger
This small but effective dagger was ac Centurion or Legionares last line of defense. Double edge steel Blade measures 8.5 inches. Polished steel scabbard features a brass embossed front plate and four brass tie fowm rings
Price: 89.99

Dagger Replica - Swept Hilt
This sleek medieval dagger features a horn handle and 10 inch long carbon steel blade with 3/4 length blood groove and brass hand guard. The dagger comes complete with a black leather scabbard. Overall Length: 15 inches Weight: 1.5lbs.
Price: 44.99



War is the reciprocal and violent application of force between hostile political entities aimed at bringing about a desired political end-state via armed conflict. In his seminal work, On War, Carl Von Clausewitz calls war the "continuation of political intercourse, carried on with other means."[1] War is an interaction in which two or more militaries have a “struggle of wills”.[2] When qualified as a civil war, it is a dispute inherent to a given society, and its nature is in the conflict over modes of governance rather than sovereignty. War is not considered to be the same as mere occupation, murder or genocide because of the reciprocal nature of the violent struggle, and the organized nature of the units involved.

War is also a cultural entity, and its practice is not linked to any single type of political organisation or society. Rather, as discussed by John Keegan in his “History Of Warfare”, war is a universal phenomenon whose form and scope is defined by the society that wages it. [3] The conduct of war extends along a continuum, from the almost universal tribal warfare that began well before recorded human history, to wars between city states, nations, or empires. A group of combatants and their support is called an army on land, a navy at sea, and air force in the air. Wars may be prosecuted simultaneously in one or more different theatres. Within each theatre, there may be one or more consecutive military campaigns. A military campaign includes not only fighting but also intelligence, troop movements, supplies, propaganda, and other components. Continuous conflict is traditionally called a battle, although this terminology is not always fed to conflicts involving aircraft, missiles or bombs alone, in the absence of ground troops or naval forces.

War is not limited to the human species, as ants engage in massive intra-species conflicts which might be termed warfare. It is theorized that other species also engage in similar behavior, although this is not well documented. [4][5][6]



[edit] History of war

Main article: History of war

Some believe war has always been with us; others stress the lack of clear evidence that war is not in our prehistoric past, and the fact that many peaceful, non-military societies have and still do exist.

Originally, war likely consisted of small-scale raiding. Since the rise of the state some 5000 years ago, military activity has occurred over much of the globe. The advent of gunpowder and the acceleration of technological advances led to modern warfare.

Since the close of the Vietnam War, the ideas expounded by the Prussian military theorist Carl von Clausewitz (1780-1831) have come to thoroughly permeate American military writing, doctrinal, theoretical, and historical. His book On War, first published (as Vom Kriege) in 1832, was adopted as a key text at the Naval War College in 1976, the Air War College in 1978, the Army War College in 1981. It has always been central at the U.S. Army's School for Advanced Military Studies at Leavenworth (founded in 1983). The U.S. Marine Corps's brilliant little philosophical field manual FMFM 1: Warfighting (1989) is essentially a distillation of On War, and the newer Marine Corps Doctrinal Publications (MCDPs, c.1997) are equally reflective of Clausewitz's basic concepts.*1

This is not the first time Clausewitz has been in fashion. Indeed, On War has been the bible of many thoughtful soldiers ever since Field Marshal Helmuth von Moltke attributed to its guidance his stunning victories in the wars of German unification (1864, 1866, 1870-71). Nor is it the first time that individual American soldiers and military thinkers have been attracted by his ideas: George Patton, Albert Wedemeyer, and—especially—Dwight Eisenhower were intensely interested in what he had to say.

It is, however, the first time that the American armed forces as institutions have turned to Clausewitz. While the philosopher had insisted that war was "simply the expression of politics by other means," the traditional attitude of American soldiers had been that "politics and strategy are radically and fundamentally things apart. Strategy begins where politics end. All that soldiers ask is that once the policy is settled, strategy and command shall be regarded as being in a sphere apart from politics."*2 The sudden acceptability of Clausewitz in the wake of Vietnam is not difficult to account for, for among the major military theorists only Clausewitz seriously struggled with the sort of dilemma that American military leaders faced in the aftermath of their defeat. Clearly, in what had come to be called in scathing terms a "political war," the political and military components of the American war effort had come unstuck. It ran against the grain of America's military men to criticize elected civilian leaders, but it was just as difficult to take the blame upon themselves. Clausewitz's analysis could not have been more relevant:

The more powerful and inspiring the motives for war,... the more closely will the military aims and the political objects of war coincide, and the more military and less political will war appear to be. On the other hand, the less intense the motives, the less will the military element's natural tendency to violence coincide with political directives. As a result, war will be driven further from its natural course, the political object will be more and more at variance with the aim of ideal war, and the conflict will seem increasingly political in character.*3

When people talk, as they often do, about harmful political influence on the management of war, they are not really saying what they mean. Their quarrel should be with the policy itself, not with its influence.

Vom Kriege (IPA[fɔm ˈkʁiːgə]) is a book on war and military strategy by Prussian general Carl von Clausewitz, written mostly after the Napoleonic wars, between 1816 and 1830, and published posthumously by his wife in 1832. It has been translated into English several times as On War. On War is actually an unfinished work; Clausewitz had set about revising his accumulated manuscripts in 1827, but did not live to finish the task. His wife eventually compiled all the work and the final two chapters Clausewitz never finished.

On War is one of the first books on modern military strategy. This is mainly due to Clausewitz' integration of politics and social and economic issues as some of the most important factors in deciding the outcomes of a war. It is one of the most important treatises on strategy ever written, and is prescribed at various military academies to this day.



[edit] History

Carl von Clausewitz was a Prussian officer among those baffled by how the armies of the French Revolution and Napoleon had changed the nature of war through their ability to motivate the populace and thus unleash war on a greater scale than had previously been the case in Europe. Clausewitz was well educated and had a strong interest in art, science, and education, but he was a professional soldier who spent a considerable part of his life fighting against Napoleon. There is no doubt that the insights he gained from his experiences, combined with a solid grasp of European history, provided much of the raw material for the book. On War represents the compilation of his most cogent observations.

Note: Clausewitz states that Napoleon's tactics were not revolutionary at all and that Napoleonic Warfare did not change anything greatly in military history. The technology of weaponry for the most part remained static, and new strategies weren't developed, but rather Napoleon refurbished old ones, mixing them into one grand strategy.

[edit] Synopsis

The book contains a wealth of historical examples used to illustrate its various concepts. Frederick II of Prussia (the Great) figures prominently for having made very efficient use of the limited forces at his disposal. Napoleon also is a central figure.

Among many strands of thought, three stand out as essential to Clausewitz' concept:

  • War must never be seen as a purpose to itself, but as a means of physically forcing one's will on an opponent ("War is not merely a political act, but also a real political instrument, a continuation of political commerce, a carrying out of the same by other means."[1]).
  • The military objectives in war that support one's political objectives fall into two broad types: "war to achieve limited aims" and war to "disarm” the enemy: “to render [him] politically helpless or militarily impotent."
  • The course of war will tend to favor the party employing more force and resources (a notion extended by Germany's leaders in World War One into "total war"—the pursuit of complete military victory regardless of the political consequences).

Military strategy is a national defence policy implemented by military organisations to pursue desired strategic goals.[1] Derived from the Greek strategos, strategy when it appeared in use during the 18th century[2], was seen in its narrow sense as the "art of the general"[3], 'the art of arrangement' of troops.[4] Military strategy deals with the planning and conduct of campaigns, the movement and disposition of forces, and the deception of the enemy. The father of modern strategic study, Carl von Clausewitz, defined military strategy as "the employment of battles to gain the end of war." Liddell Hart's definition put less emphasis on battles, defining strategy as "the art of distributing and applying military means to fulfil the ends of policy" Hence, both gave the pre-eminence to political aims over military goals, ensuring civilian control of the military.



[edit] Fundamentals

"You must not fight too often with one enemy, or you will teach him all your art of war." Napoleon Bonaparte

Military strategy is the plan and execution of the contest between very large groups of armed adversaries. It involves each opponent's diplomatic, informational, military, and economic resources wielded against the other's resources to gain supremacy or reduce the opponent's will to fight. It is a principle tool to secure the national interest. A contemporary military strategy is developed via military science. [5] It is as old as society itself. It is a subdiscipline of warfare and of foreign policy. In comparison, grand strategy is that strategy of the largest of organizations which are currently the nation state, confederation, or international alliances. Military strategy has its origins before the Battle of the Ten Kings and will endure through the space age. It is larger in perspective than military tactics which is the disposition and maneuver of units on a particular sea or battlefield.[6]

[edit] Background

Military strategy in the 19th century was still viewed as one of a trivium of "arts" or "sciences" that govern the conduct of warfare; the others being tactics, the execution of plans and manœuvering of forces in battle, and logistics, the maintenance of an army. The view had prevailed since the Roman times, and the borderline between strategy and tactics at this time was blurred, and sometimes categorization of a decision is a matter of almost personal opinion. Carnot, during the French Revolutionary Wars thought it simply involved concentration of troops.[7]

The Battle of Siffin, illustration from a 19th century manuscript by Muhammad Rafi Bazil.

Strategy and tactics are closely related and exist on the same continuum.



Site Map



Site map


ROV ZEUS Gold Coin Glitter Water Globe
SS Republic Coaster Set
Tortoise Bead Earrings
Replica Coin in Sterling Silver Bezel
Dancing Woman Replica
Slide Necklace
Blue China Necklace with Black Bead Center
Square Spirits Bottle - Olive Green /Glass
1861-O State of Louisiana Issue Liberty Seated Half Dollar
SS Republic Gold Coins Print Framed

Privacy Statement Advertise with us All rights reserved ExcitingAds® 1998-2008